One of your fellow students comes up to you and asks the following question, "if an object is not moving, can it be accelerating? " based on your prior knowledge of this topic, what is the best response? a). yes, becuase acceleration depends on the rate of change of velocity and not the value of velocity itself.
b). no, acceleration and velocity are equivalent, so if one equals zero, the other must also equal zero.
d). yes, but only if the object's acceleration is very small.
d). yes, but only if the acceleration is negative in order to keep velocity equal to zero.

correct answer is option A (Yes, becuase acceleration depends on the rate of change of velocity and not the value of velocity itself.)

Explanation:

we know that from first equation of motion,

v=u+at

0r

............(1)

here,

v-final velocity

u-initial velocity

a-acceleration

t-time

if a body is not moving it means if its initial velocity is zero (u=0) and if after time t it moves with velocity v then its acceleration will be given as

...........(2)

From above equation it is clear that if an object is not moving, it can be accelerating because acceleration depends on rate of change of velocity and not the value of velocity itself.

the box does not move because you need to use a force greater than 300 n. you are only using 50 n. it needs to at least be 301 n for the box to move because then it is an unbalanced force and it will move the way that the greater force is pushing it. if you use only 300 n it will be a balanced force and will not move because the force you are exerting on the   box is the same as its force.

hope this !

im sorry if i went too in depth, i am going to include a link to a video on khan academy that will explain this.   hope that you like the video and that it explains more in detail to you.

that is the link.