Since rods are about 1000 times more sensitive than cones (at 500 nm), they should be able to detect smaller values of the electric field. assuming rods and cones are sensitive to the average energy density of an electromagnetic wave, which of the following statements is correct? view available hint(s) since rods are about 1000 times more sensitive than cones (at 500 ), they should be able to detect smaller values of the electric field. assuming rods and cones are sensitive to the average energy density of an electromagnetic wave, which of the following statements is correct? rods are able to detect electric fields 1000 times smaller than the fields detectable by cones. rods are able to detect electric fields 1000/3=333 times smaller than the fields detectable by cones. rods are able to detect electric fields 1000√=32 times smaller than the fields detectable by cones. rods are able to detect electric fields 3 times smaller than the fields detectable by cones.
Answers: 1
Physics, 22.06.2019 14:10
What is the weight of a 8-kg substance in n, kn, kg·m/s2, kgf, lbm·ft/s2, and lbf?
Answers: 2
Physics, 22.06.2019 17:20
Scientific models are based on current knowledge, which can limit their effectiveness when new discoveries are made.
Answers: 1
Physics, 22.06.2019 20:30
Atypical jetliner lands at a speed of 146 mi/h and decelerates at the rate of (10.4 mi/h)/s. if the jetliner travels at a constant speed of 146 mi/h for 1.5 s after landing before applying the brakes, what is the total displacement of the jetliner between touchdown on the runway and coming to rest?
Answers: 2
Since rods are about 1000 times more sensitive than cones (at 500 nm), they should be able to detect...
Mathematics, 12.01.2021 04:50
Mathematics, 12.01.2021 04:50
Biology, 12.01.2021 04:50
English, 12.01.2021 04:50
Mathematics, 12.01.2021 04:50
Mathematics, 12.01.2021 04:50
History, 12.01.2021 04:50