Why is the more cumbersome two's complement representation preferred instead of the more intuitive sign bit magnitude approach?

Explanation:

The two's-complement mechanism has the benefit that it does not require the addition and subtraction circuitry to investigate the operands ' signs to evaluate either to add or subtract. This property makes the whole thing both easier to accomplish and able to handle arithmetic of higher accuracy with ease. Also Zero has only one interpretation, bypassing the subtle nuances associated with negative one that arise in the complement-systems of ones.

i'm on my way to history not a mistory.

inverse v=i*r

nice nice