Some say that the fact that scientific models change over time is proof that scientists from earlier historical eras were bad at their jobs. Which statement best argues against this position?
Scientists can only use the information available at the time to create their models.
Scientific models do not always get more accurate over time.
Mathematical models arefalways more accurate than non-mathematical models.
The ultimate goal of science is to produce accurate models that predict behavior.

scientists can only use the information available at the time to create their models

Explanation:

I am doing classes on this and scientific theories. For in the past the models they used back then were amazing. Like the "plum pudding model" it was inaccurate but at the time it was accepted because it was backed by science. Now that we have advanced tools and machines to help us models are now more accurate then ever. In 30 years from now people can look back and think our scientific models were bad because they found better information to make models even better.

( I hope this helps you!)

:)

colorectal cancer may also develop from areas of abnormal cells in the lining of the colon or rectum. this area of abnormal cells is called dysplasia and is more commonly seen in people with certain inflammatory diseases of the bowel such as crohn's disease or ulcerative colitis.

grav force prop 1/r squared 2r all squared is 4rsquared 1/4rsquared quartered