I'm strugglingg in science and I need help "Why did Vehicle 2 fall off the cliff in Claire's test of the collision scene, but Vehicle 2 did not fall off the cliff in the film Iceworld Revenge? Claim 1: The vehicles in Iceworld Revenge had different masses; in Claire’s test, the vehicles had the same mass.

Claim 2: The friction of the surface that was used in Iceworld Revenge was different from the friction of the surface in Claire’s test.

State your claim. Use evidence to support your claim, and then explain how the evidence supports your claim."

the answer is friction and mass.

Explanation:The reason that Vehicle 2 fell off the cliff in Claire's test of the collision scene, but Vehicle 2 did not fall off the cliff in the film Iceworld Revenge is because of the friction and mass. A different friction, called foam, is used in Claire's test. The foam has a really low friction that caused vehicle 2 to fall from the cliff. According to evidence card B which states that, “In Iceworld Revenge, Vehicle 2 moves slowly toward the cliff after the collision, halting only before it goes over the side. In Clasir's test, Vehicle 2 went over the cliff at full speed”.This evidence confirms my arguments that in the film, vehicle 2 did not drive as quickly as in the film scene of Claire . __

speed

ratio of distance traveled to time interval

net force

vector sum of forces on object

object

source of diverging light rays either luminous or illuminated

don't remove my answer im trying my best to answer them

explanation:

i already answered it by 34/s