Which statement best explains why an object weighs less on Mercury than it does on
Earth?
A. Mercury is less dense than Earth.
B. Mercury is more dense than Earth.
C. Mercury has a stronger gravitational pull
than Earth does.
D. Mercury has a weaker gravitational pull
than Earth does.

I will mark Brainiest of answered in the next 5 minutes!!

option D

Explanation:

D.Mecury has a weeker gravitational pull than the Earth does

note: the given question is incomplete.

complete question is given below.

which is an example of kinetic energy?

a. the energy stored in ethanol  

b. a hockey puck sliding across the ice  

c. a compressed spring  

d. a ball sitting at the top of a ramp

solution: the kinetic energy is the energy posses by the virtue of the motion of the object.

in the given options, a, c and d are the example of potential energy because it is the energy posses by the virtue of the rest of the object. but option b has the kinetic energy as the object is in motion.

hence, a hockey puck sliding across the ice   is the apex example of kinetic energy.

so, the option (b) a hockey puck sliding across the ice   is the correct option.

the ima (higher than 1m) will be greater than the ima with the height of 1m.