Pluto has been reassigned and is now a dwarf planet. Why did scientists think this reassignment was necessary? If you were a scientist at that time, would you be for or against the reassignment of Pluto? What evidence would you give to defend your choice?

Fu ck me hardder then you ever had before daddy

Explanation:

Explanation:

we humans have our own ify classification for celestial objects, most people are saddened that pluto is not a planet anymore altho it hasn't changed at all.

scientist say that if an object is going to be considered a planet it must fill in these three checkboxes:

You must be spherical, you must orbit a star, and you must have already cleared your path or debris.

Pluto fills in the first two boxes but it does orbit in the keyperbelt and there are 5 other objects just like it. this is why pluto has been dubbed a dwarf planet.

5 w for 1hr = 5x60x60 joules=300x60=3000x6=18,000j as total energy conversion. efficiency of bulb needed for radiant to thermal within 18000

magnified images possible images can be real = projected onto a screen