Physics, 10.11.2021 01:00 pmgpmgutube

What can cause an apparent change in pixel dimensions during aerial photogrammetry videos?

Answers: 1

Show answers

Answers

https://www.researchgate.net/post/What_can_cause_an_apparent_change_in_pixel_dimensions_during_aerial_photogrammetry_videos

Answer from: nia3378

Hello all,

Hello all,We are using the Inspire 2 drone/Zenmuse x7 camera to capture aerial videos of cetaceans. From these videos, we extract still images from which we then calculate the length and width of individual animals using a software that calculates morphometric measurements based on the pixel dimensions of the images, the lens focal length, and the height of the drone.The videos are recorded at 5280x2160 resolution at an altitude of between 45-50 meters, using the DJI DL 50mm F2.8 LS ASPH lens, shutter speed 1/500, 29.97 fps. For some of our images, our pixel dimension appears to be 0.00445 mm/pixel, while in other images it is around 0.0034 mm/pixel (pixel dimensions calculated using a control object). This change in pixel dimension does not appear to be correlated with either the height or the tilt of the drone, and we have tried to camera in both auto-focus and manual-focus modes. We are not sure if this is an issue with the camera settings or a sign of a larger issue, but we would very much appreciate any suggestions as to what might be causing this problem!

Answer from: Quest

i had this question and the answer was 3.15 miles.

martina travels from school to her mom's office. from there, she walks to school. after school, she walks to the library and then to a friends house before finally ending back at home. find martina's total distance traveled.

a) 0 miles

b) 0.4 miles

c) 1 mile

d) 3.15 miles

Answer from: Quest

option number c is the right answer.

Another question on Physics

Physics, 22.06.2019 08:00

While studying chemical reactions and conservation of matter, sarah's class conducted a variety of experiments. sarah and her lab partner found the mass of a wax candle and placed the candle in a flask. the students lit the candle and let it burn to completion. all that was left was wax and charred candle wick. per their teacher's instructions, the students found the mass of the products. their data can be seen in the data table. formulate a hypothesis the students could test to explain why the experiment did not support the law of conservation of matter. a) the students could repeat the experiment using different candles; there might have been a flaw in the candle. b) the experiment should be repeatable. the students should run several trials and then take an average of the after mass in each trial. c) the students should have someone in the class check their measurement skills as they repeat the experiment. they may have made an error using the balance. d) the students should burn the candle in a container that has some type of lid so that any gas that is a product of the reaction can be contained and massed. submit

Answers: 2

Answer

Physics, 22.06.2019 15:50

The california mussel (mytilus californianus) attaches itself to a rock or other solid surface with a bundle of filaments known as the byssus. imagine that 15.0 j of work is done to stretch the distal end of the byssus. it releases 10.8 j of thermal energy as it relaxes. what is the resilience of the distal end of the byssus?

Answers: 2

Answer

Physics, 22.06.2019 21:30

The three classes of rocks are sedimentary, metamorphic, and igneous. how are rocks classified into one of these three groups?

Answers: 1

Answer

Physics, 22.06.2019 22:00

Aparticle of mass m is placed in a one-dimensional box of length l. the box is so small that the particle’s motion is relativistic, so that e p2/2m is not valid. (a) derive an expression for the energy levels of the particle using the relativistic energy–momentum relation and the quantization of momentum that derives from connement. (b) if the particle is an electron in a box of length l 1.00 1012 m, nd its lowest possible kinetic energy. by what percent is the nonrelativistic formula for the energy in error?