If different groups of scientist have access to the same data, how can they draw different conclusions? scientists manipulate data to fit their hypotheses, which results in different conclusions. scientific predictions must list every possibility, and so scientists are not technically incorrect. scientists have different specialties and will interpret data differently, depending on their specialties. scientific predictions are not usually testable, so this leads to different conclusions.

Alinearly polarized electromagnetic wave has an average intensity of 196 w/m^2. this wave is directed towards two ideal polarizers (in real polarizers, transmission is also effected by reflection and absorption). polarizer a is oriented with its transmission axis at an angle of θ_1=20.8∘ with the incident electric field. polarizer b has its axis at an angle of θ_2=63.0∘ with the incident electric field. what is the average intensity of the wave after it passes through polarizer a? what is the average intensity of the wave after it passes through polarizer b? suppose that the two polarizers a and b are interchanged. what would the average intensity be after passing through both polarizers?

Athin nonconducting rod with a uniform distribution of positive charge q is bent into a circle of radius r. the central perpendicular axis through the ring is a z-axis, with the origin at the center of the ring. a) what is the magnitude of the electric field due to the rod at z = 0? n/c (b) what is the magnitude of the electric field due to the rod at z = infinity? n/c (c) in terms of r, at what positive value of z is that magnitude maximum? r (d) if r = 4.00 cm and q = 9.00 µc, what is the maximum magnitude? n/c

which statements describe the image? check all that apply.the wood is releasing argon gas.this information is useful for dating ancient rock.the process works only with organic matter.the element has a half-life of 5,730 years.this shows the half-life of carbon-19.