(a) identify the constitutional clause that is common to both abington v. Schempp and engel v. Vitale. (b) based on the constitutional clause identified in part a, explain why the facts of engel v. Vitale and abington v. Schempp led to a similar holding in both cases. (c) describe an action that members of the public could take to limit the impact of abington v. Schempp if they disagreed with the court’s decision.