subject
Social Studies, 17.07.2019 10:00 unkown77

Jack is having difficulty understanding the 14th amendment and 19th amendment together. he argues that the 14th amendment says to treat people equally, but it wasn’t until the 19th amendment that women were able to vote. which is the best comment to jack? a. the 14th amendment said that only men were citizens; the 19th amendment declared women as citizens, thus giving them voting rights. b. the 19th amendment took the place of the 14th amendment since women were left out of the earlier amendment. c. this is the same argument that susan b. anthony made; it is how she proposed the 19th amendment. d. the 14th amendment protected people; the 19th amendment gave privileges to women. the two amendments are not related.

ansver
Answers: 2

Another question on Social Studies

question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 22:00
Should the city pass a ban on skateboarders on all public property, or are the citizens who oppose the ban right when they argue that there are benefits to having the skateboarders in public parks? plan and write a response in which you state your position and persuade readers to agree with you. support your position with reasons and examples drawn from the proposed amendment to ban skateboarding and from information in the letters to the editor, as well as from your own experience.
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 22:00
Population parameters are difficult to calculate due to
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 00:50
Sara and her friends were at an iowa football game in iowa city. sara is a life long resident of iowa and goes to college at dmacc. while she was in iowa city, robert smashed into her car when he ran a red light. sara was seriously injured and taken to university hospitals in iowa city (fortunately her injuries were not life threatening but laid her up for a long time and she had to drop out of college for the rest of the semester). robert is from michigan and was in iowa city to see the game and then to party later. at the time of the accident robert was drunk (at least legally - he blew a 0.17 and the limit is 0.08). sara has sustained about $500,000 in damages between her current and future medical bills, pain/suffering, lost wages, etc. also her car was totaled in the accident. can sara sue robert in a federal court? explain why or why not. (be sure to mention the two primary factors associated with suing someone in a federal court in a case like this.)
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 10:00
Study this form which is allowed in and her knee name thomas as a moto to temporarily leave and interment camp what is the most likely purpose for including the statement at the top of
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
Jack is having difficulty understanding the 14th amendment and 19th amendment together. he argues th...
Questions
question
Advanced Placement (AP), 28.06.2021 08:00
question
Mathematics, 28.06.2021 08:00
question
English, 28.06.2021 08:00
question
Mathematics, 28.06.2021 08:00
Questions on the website: 13722367