In debates leading up to the 3/5 compromise, northern states argued that: a. a strong federal government was necessary in order to ensure that slave states did not have an unfair economic advantage b. southern states should only be allowed to send representatives to the house of representatives, not to the senate c. slaves should not be included when counting a states population to determine representation in congress d. slaves should be able to buy their freedom after working for a certain number of years

Explain why the judicial branch is considered the weakest branch. explain what might happen if the judicial branch could not separate itself from the other two branches. explain how a strong judiciary branch would maintain limited government and individual rights. explain why a law that contradicts the constitution must be ruled invalid. explain why the legislature may not determine if its laws are unconstitutional. hamilton argues that the judicial branch is not above the legislative branch. explain his reasoning. how is the problem solved when two laws passed by the same legislature contradict each other? explain why hamilton believes it is pointless to argue the power of judicial review will enable judges to rule in ways that serve their own interests. explain how life tenure is necessary for the judicial branch to be able to protect individual rights against a majority. explain how everyone benefits when the rights of individuals or groups are protected. explain how limited terms of office might discourage the best-qualified people.

Thomas more's fictional text about a society governed by reason and order is most likely a response to the conflict between a)the king and church leaders b)male and female leaders c)rulers of other nations d)royalty and the working class

A“carpetbagger” would have been most likely to come from which state?