How did the ruling in plessy v. ferguson affect the legalities of segregation? it set “separate but equal” as a legal precedent. it implemented desegregation legislation. it determined that separation based on race can never be equal. it discouraged people from continued protests.

The answer is "It set “separate but equal” as a legal precedent."

Plessy v. Ferguson alludes to a US Supreme Court decision reclaimed in 1896 that maintained the issue of racial isolation. It was recommended under the “separate but equal” precept on protected grounds.  

The case was the result of an occurrence that had occurred in 1892. An African-American traveler Homer Plessy had declined to sit down in a railroad auto saved for blacks. The Supreme Court passed a decision that rejected Plessy's contention of infringement of protected rights.  

Further, it decided that any state law that "infers just a legitimate qualification" between the blacks and whites was not in struggle with the thirteenth and fourteenth Amendments of the US Constitution.

It set “separate but equal” as a legal precedent ruling given in Plessy versus Ferguson.

Further Explanation:  

Plessy versus Ferguson is the case held on 18th May 1896. Supreme Court of the USA maintained isolationism on racial grounds. It sets the precedent of “separate but equal”. This case validated the constitutionality of segregation on racial grounds. This case inquired the definition of 14th amendment and it constitutes the equal protection clause. The case overturn the decision of the other cases of Supreme Court i.e. Brown versus Board of Education of Topeka in 1954.  

The decision was influenced by French, which taught toleration towards people of other colour. This case challenged Louisiana Separate Car Act. The decision legalised many laws made by the state. Plessy was an “Octoroon”.

Octoroon referred to a person of 7-8th whites and 1-8th black ancestry. Octoroon was from New Orleans, who violated the Separate Act. The lawyer of Plessy defended him by saying that the law was made unconstitutional. He lost the case and he appealed to the Supreme Court of USA. Supreme Court by 7-1 majority decided that the law of Louisiana did not violate the 14th amendment.  It established the fact that there is equality among White and Black Americans legally. It eliminated all social distinctions which were earlier based on colour. The state legislature of America made laws on health and safety. It too determined police powers. John Marshall said that the Constitution of USA is colour- blind.

Learn more:

Answer Details:

Grade: High School

Subject: Political Science

Keywords: 18 May 1896, isolationism, separate but equal, constitutionality, 14th amendment, equal protection, Octoroon, Louisiana separate car act.

this statement is true.

forests are public goods, available for everybody. when usage of such a good becomes interesting for consumers and its usage increases, there can be a risk of overexploitation. it is a non rival good therefore, if one person consumes the good it does not reduce the availability for subsequent consumers.

these caracteristics require the establishment of measures in order to prevent the destruction of a commonly owned space, for example, to restrict the amount of people that have access to the same time.