In anthropology, which historically exists to 'give voice' to others, there is no greater taboo than self-revelation. the impetus of our discipline, with its roots in western fantasies about barbaric others, has been to focus primarily on 'cultural' rather than 'individual' realities. the irony is that anthropology has always been rooted in an 'i' - understood as having a complex psychology and history - observing a 'we' that, until recently, was viewed as plural, ahistorical, and nonindividuated.