subject
Social Studies, 09.07.2019 20:30 dai77

Bossuet's idea that monarchies, as representatives of god's will, could rule absolutely, ignoring the will and well-being of their subjects is select one: a. a social contract b. natural law c. the divine right of kings d. inalienable rights

ansver
Answers: 2

Another question on Social Studies

question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 01:40
Ms. h's family is in the waiting room of the intensive care unit. ms. h is very ill and the family has been told she will probably die during this hospital admission. you are walking by the waiting room and you see that they are all seated together, crying. what is your best response? this task contains the radio buttons and checkboxes for options. the shortcut keys to perform this task are a to h and alt+1 to alt+9. a go into the waiting room, sit next to them, and give them time to talk with you. b call the hospital chaplain to visit them and offer prayers. c find a social worker to go into the waiting room to see if they need anything. d leave them alone to give them private time to do their grieving.
Answers: 2
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 03:30
Why were the gods angry at odysseus in the odyssey
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 12:00
What policy did "jim crow" laws put in place? black codes integration segregation 2. the supreme court case that established the doctrine of "separate but equal" was dred scott v. sandford plessy v. ferguson brown v. board of education 3. the supreme court case that overturned the doctrine of "separate but equal" wasdred scott v. sandford plessy v. ferguson brown v. board of education
Answers: 3
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 13:00
Awoman was found strangled in the basement of her home where she lived with her husband. the crime scene was processed and investigators left. the next day, the medical examiner reported that a scalloped, woven belt was used to strangle the victim. the police asked the husband to search the house again to look for such a belt and he agreed. a belt was found that matched marks on the victim. the man was arrested. his attorney made a motion that the belt be excluded from the evidence as he contended that the search was not legal. which statement is true? a. the belt should be excluded because the search was not legal. the police did not obtain a search warrant, as needed according to the fourth amendment to the u.s. constitution. b. the belt is admissible because the man gave his consent to the second search. c. the belt should be excluded because the search was not legal. the police did not obtain a search warrant, as need according to michigan v. tyler. d. the belt is admissible as evidence, according to mincey v. arizona.
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
Bossuet's idea that monarchies, as representatives of god's will, could rule absolutely, ignoring th...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 18.07.2020 01:01
Questions on the website: 13722361