Explain how one small act can have a large and far reaching effects

Many times we underestimate the small facts but they can change the course of our lives. If we think tragically for example a person who drives and is distracted for a moment, he bends down to look for something fallen (for example) he loses vision and is involved in an accident. This brings great economic and judicial complications.

If we want to give an example with a positive thinking we could think of a person who sees a lost animal and decides to rescue it. It's something quick, you think in an instant. When he gets home, he sees a television notice that the owner is looking for the pet and he gets in touch. The owner turns out to be someone very grateful who rewards the person economically (and it turns out that he is a student to whom the money helps him enormously)

We could give thousands of examples, positive and negative, of how our lives are going in relation to our decisions and our destiny.

if interdependence implies a two-way dependence, and if each partner is equally dependent on the other for success, then there is an equal commitment to the making the partnership successful. the advantage is sustainability of the relationship, the disadvantage is that decisions are "democratic" and therefore may take longer to reach and more likely to be a compromise (which is not always the best solution). as the interdependence moves away from equality, the decisions become more influenced by the more independent partner. in the extreme the relationship becomes more dictatorial and more like "master-slave". generally the relationship has less commitment in both directions and is more likely to be temporary.

if one generalizes (and one shouldn't), equity partnerships, which is probably what is implied by interdependence, can be slow to progress or change but durable. the extreme alternative, independent-dependent partnerships tend to be efficient but more fragile.

hope this but you will have to site your own evidence. : )

it should be c, women were allowed to vote in all states because federal law supersedes state law.

"states can make their own laws, as long as they don't contradict what the federal law states. the states do not have the authority to pass a law that negates a federal law." -google