Think local—how is the lawmaking process at a local level different from the state or federal government? use complete sentences.

At the state and the federal government the process of law-making is quite similar: a congress representative proposes a law, that is examined by a committee and if it passes this examination it is submitted to the floor for its debating and/or amendments and then it is voted upon by the first chamber. If approved, it will go through the same process in the second chamber.  A local law is the law of a local government, a municipality. The lawmaking process for these laws is quite different. Local laws are called ordinances and their lawmaking process is the following:

-A local politician, a private citizen (through a public petition), a council or a board will propose a new local law.

-A city council or the special committee will propose the law.

-The law will be discussed and modified and sent back and forth between the city council and a specialized committee.

-Readings of the law and public hearings in which local citizens can discuss and criticize or support the law will be held.

-After such hearings and final discussions the law will be voted and if approved it will be officially adopted (in some places the major has to approve it as well).

State and federal lawmaking does not include public hearings with regards to laws since it is considered that congresspersons are there to do that on behalf of their constituents as their elected representatives.

I know the answer

Explanation:

ITS JOHNYYY

soothing tone) but quickly, the tone changes from a light tone to a grim one. by introducing disturbing word choices that are illogical.make a list of some of levertov’s images of war from both of her poems. how do her wordsaffect you? do you agree with her position on war? write a short response (at least 100 words) and support your answer with personal experience or your studiespoets can change the tone in a poem, and levertov does when the she refers to "delicate man . .whose eyes/are flowers that perceive the stars”. the word choices here are different. theimages began to show feelings of hope/potential. but this mood is interrupted with the dark oppressive words "entrails of still-alive babies" and "carcass-gulleys". levertov continues to switch tones by "the deep intelligence living at peace would have"—one is left with a sense of hope. i can connect with her words that humans can do better things than fight in war. we only have one life so dying in a war would be for no reason. also, i am a christian and in the bible, it says "thou shall not kill", and i strongly believe in that.people respond differently to satire—some like it, others don't get it. in at least 150 words, describe what you think of goines's narrative essay. discuss whether you think his position is convincing.the satire kept people's attention, rather than just rambling. instead of being dead serious, he adds humor to enlighten it. i think he did a good job of proving his point, but convincing people to stray from their own beliefs is hard, and satire can be offensive to that person. overall i think that goines's narrative essay was good because narrative essay create deeper understanding. i also like that the narrative essay is in first-person. the essay was filled with diction and word choice to let you know that the essay is going to be witty yet satirical. his point was to write  

explanation: