Judicial restraint means that a judge will consider when making decisions about a case. a. judicial activism b. judicial philosophy c. politics d. precedent

The correct answer is D. Precedent

Explanation:

In law, the term judicial restraint refers to a limitation in power judge have when taking decisions in a legal case. According to judicial restraint, principle judges should not go against laws except if they are really unconstitutional and should consider precedents or the decisions taken by other judges in similar cases before taking a final decision. Additionally, this concept is the opposite of the term judicial activism in which judges follow their personal perspectives rather than the law and precedents in court cases. Therefore, Judicial restraint means that a judge will consider precedents when making decisions about a case.

d.

thist title points out that you are explaining the nature of the u.s. government. it is the most specific. a representative government consists of a government where decisions are taken according to a voting system. the most essential aspect of a representative government is found in the different structures where voting rights are granted to different groups of people. for example, voting for governor, mayor, president, local police chief etc.

answer; the federal reserve system;