What statement best describes the outcome of the dred scott case

That Scott, as a slave, was not a citizen and therefore had no right to sue

Scott did not win and could not sue anyone.

Explanation:

the supreme court ruled on two issues. first, it said that Scott was not a citizen and thus did not have the right to bring a lawsuit. Second, the Missouri compromise was unconstitutional therefore Scott was not free.

i believe your answer is true

sorry if wrong

good question. i'll be looking into that. (this is a joke sir)