Which argument for religious reform might be convincing to a priest, pope, or king?

Having studied the history of the Protestant Reformation, and the creation of the Anglican Church, we see that there was a religious reformation in the Church of England to meet their personal interests. The Catholic Church, in the person of its priests and popes, should follow the doctrines from the beginnings of the Church. Some doctrines and commandments tried to make people establish a certain order in life. Any extra additions to the scriptures were better for control purposes.

Nowadays, society has changed, and for the protection of the faith of believers, the Church ends up trying to adjust old precretes with the social reality of today, that ends up generating a little religious reform.

if interdependence implies a two-way dependence, and if each partner is equally dependent on the other for success, then there is an equal commitment to the making the partnership successful. the advantage is sustainability of the relationship, the disadvantage is that decisions are "democratic" and therefore may take longer to reach and more likely to be a compromise (which is not always the best solution). as the interdependence moves away from equality, the decisions become more influenced by the more independent partner. in the extreme the relationship becomes more dictatorial and more like "master-slave". generally the relationship has less commitment in both directions and is more likely to be temporary.

if one generalizes (and one shouldn't), equity partnerships, which is probably what is implied by interdependence, can be slow to progress or change but durable. the extreme alternative, independent-dependent partnerships tend to be efficient but more fragile.

hope this but you will have to site your own evidence. : )

answer; /// i believe the correct answer is (wine) ; /// good luck