subject
Social Studies, 29.01.2020 00:59 AliMe52

How did us labor unions treat chinese immigrants in the 1800s? labor unions discriminated against chinese immigrants and did not allow them to join. labor unions chinese immigrants find jobs in factories and mills. labor unions asked employers to pay chinese immigrants lesser wages than union members. labor unions chinese immigrants form their own unions.

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on Social Studies

question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 06:30
The conflict perspective explains deviance in terms of power and inequality. select the best answer from the choices provided true or false
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 14:30
On this map, the state of georgia is in which section of the map?
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 02:30
Which of the fallowing sports became spectator sport at the turn of the century ? a)basketball and boxing b)soccer and football c)racquetball and badminton d)polo and swimming
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 05:30
Athief was passing by a house under construction when he noticed that the ladder being used by workers on the roof had copper braces supporting the rungs. after making sure that the workers on the roof could not see him, the thief used pliers that he had in his pocket to remove all of the copper braces that he could reach from the ground. a short time later, a worker climbed down the ladder and it collapsed. he fell to the ground and severely injured his back. the thief was apprehended a few hours later trying to sell the copper for scrap. a statute in the jurisdiction makes it a felony for "maliciously causing serious physical injury to another." the thief was charged with malicious injury under the statute and was also charged with larceny. after a jury trial in which the above facts were presented, he was convicted of both charges. if he appeals the conviction for the malicious injury charge on grounds of insufficient evidence, how should the court rule? a affirm the conviction, because the thief was engaged in criminal conduct at the time of the act that resulted in the injury. b affirm the conviction, because the jury could have found that the thief acted with malice. c reverse the conviction, because there was no evidence that the thief intended to injure anyone. d reverse the conviction, because there was no evidence that the thief bore any malice towards the workers on the roof.
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
How did us labor unions treat chinese immigrants in the 1800s? labor unions discriminated against c...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 10.10.2021 07:40
Questions on the website: 13722362