An excerpt from brown vs. board of education, 1954. segregation of white and negro children in the public schools of a state solely on the basis of race, pursuant to state laws permitting or requiring such segregation, denies to negro children the equal protection of the laws guaranteed by the fourteenth amendment -- even though the physical facilities and other "tangible" factors of white and negro schools may be equal. (a) the history of the fourteenth amendment is inconclusive as to its intended effect on public education. (b) the question presented in these cases must be determined not on the basis of conditions existing when the fourteenth amendment was adopted, but in the light of the full development of public education and its present place in american life throughout the nation. (c) where a state has undertaken to provide an opportunity for an education in its public schools, such an opportunity is a right which must be made available to all on equal terms. (d) segregation of children in public schools solely on the basis of race deprives children of the minority group of equal educational opportunities, even though the physical facilities and other "tangible" factors may be equal. (e) the "separate but equal" doctrine adopted in plessy v. ferguson, 163 u. s. 537, has no place in the field of public education. (f) the cases are restored to the docket for further argument on specified questions relating to the forms of the decrees. why does the court determine that the notion of "separate but equal" ought not apply to this case? a) because public education changes the rules of the game, necessitating racial integration. b) because the plessy v. ferguson case is still pertinent. c) because "separate but equal," if sound in theory, has never worked out in practice, and thus must be abandoned everywhere. d) because the fourteenth amendment militates against "separate but equal" and insists upon integration in all cases.