subject
Social Studies, 21.09.2019 10:30 juniorcehand04

During a professional ice hockey game, fans from around the world saw tony bertram, a professional hockey player, punch an unsuspecting player in the face and throw him onto the ice. based on what you know about analytic and holistic thinking styles, which of the following do you think is most likely to happen? east asians and westerners will equally blame tony's family problems. east asians will blame tony's family problems, and westerners will blame tony's nasty personality. east asians will blame tony's nasty personality, and westerners will blame tony's family problems. east asians and westerners will equally blame tony's nasty personality. east asians will blame tony's family problems, and westerners will blame tony's teammates.

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on Social Studies

question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 08:30
Ball is tossed up in the air at its peak, it stops before beginning to fall.the ball at its peak has
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 10:30
Federalism began to spread super soon after
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 23:00
Which of the following statements concerning brazil since independence is not true? brazilians today can participate in politics through voting. brazil has been governed by dictators and elected officials. brazil became independent from portugal in 1822. brazil was the first country in the americas to end slavery.
Answers: 2
question
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 01:50
Research and review one of the following cases: 1. eeoc vs abercrombie and fitch inc. 2. young vs ups 3. vance vs ball state university after you have thought through and understand the case answer the following: 1. explain the facts of the case leading to the dispute. 2. define and show understanding of each of the terms assigned to your case. break the laws into components where necessary. eeoc vs abercrombie and fitch inc: 1) eeoc, 2) title vii, 3) disparate treatment discrimination, 4)disparate impact discrimination vance vs ball state university: 1) eeoc, 2) title vii, 3) hostile work environment, 4) a supervisor for title vii purposes young vs ups: 1) title vii, 2) pregnancy discrimination act, 3)american's with disabilities act, 4) reasonable accommodation 3.how do the above concepts come into play in the case? 4. what rule of law came from the case? what did the court decide? 5. based on your understanding of employment law was the ruling correct? explain using a legal principle.
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
During a professional ice hockey game, fans from around the world saw tony bertram, a professional h...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 28.10.2019 22:31
question
History, 28.10.2019 22:31
question
Chemistry, 28.10.2019 22:31
Questions on the website: 13722361