National defense, protecting emerging industries, protecting domestic jobs, and keep money at home are most likely arguments in favor of

These arguments are in favor of Protectionism.

Protectionism is an economy theory that consists of restricting imports from other countries to protect the local industries as well as producers and workers. To do so, there are many ways of intervening, like putting tariffs on imported goods and restricting trade to an specific quantity of goods that can be imported in a given period of time (import quota).

georgians assisted in financing united states war effort during world war i through both of the following options:

they bought war bonds from the government.

and

they gave food through the creation of victory/liberty gardens.

if interdependence implies a two-way dependence, and if each partner is equally dependent on the other for success, then there is an equal commitment to the making the partnership successful. the advantage is sustainability of the relationship, the disadvantage is that decisions are "democratic" and therefore may take longer to reach and more likely to be a compromise (which is not always the best solution). as the interdependence moves away from equality, the decisions become more influenced by the more independent partner. in the extreme the relationship becomes more dictatorial and more like "master-slave". generally the relationship has less commitment in both directions and is more likely to be temporary.

if one generalizes (and one shouldn't), equity partnerships, which is probably what is implied by interdependence, can be slow to progress or change but durable. the extreme alternative, independent-dependent partnerships tend to be efficient but more fragile.

hope this but you will have to site your own evidence. : )