After completing your observations of officer jones, you are asked to summarize your observations for a study being conducted by an ethicist studying police behavior. in the above example regarding the driver who ran the red light, we could say that jones' actions were unethical because he had a duty to enforce the law. this viewpoint would be consistent with a(n) ethical system.

In the above example regarding the driver who ran the red light, we could say that Jones' actions were unethical because he had a duty to enforce the law. This viewpoint would be consistent with a ethical system.

a. deontological

b. teleological

c. ethics of care

d. ethics of virtue

The Answer is a. deontological

I hope this helps? If im even correct

Deontological ethical system

Explanation:

Deontology is the branch of ethics that deals with duties, especially those that govern professional activities. Professionals such as police officers, doctors, lawyers, teachers, engineers, psychologists, should be aware of the ethical standards demanded by their work in specific.

Therefore, Officer Jones has failed in his deontological ethical system by not complying with the rule of enforcing the law and infringing the driver who passed the red light.

soothing tone) but quickly, the tone changes from a light tone to a grim one. by introducing disturbing word choices that are illogical.make a list of some of levertov’s images of war from both of her poems. how do her wordsaffect you? do you agree with her position on war? write a short response (at least 100 words) and support your answer with personal experience or your studiespoets can change the tone in a poem, and levertov does when the she refers to "delicate man . .whose eyes/are flowers that perceive the stars”. the word choices here are different. theimages began to show feelings of hope/potential. but this mood is interrupted with the dark oppressive words "entrails of still-alive babies" and "carcass-gulleys". levertov continues to switch tones by "the deep intelligence living at peace would have"—one is left with a sense of hope. i can connect with her words that humans can do better things than fight in war. we only have one life so dying in a war would be for no reason. also, i am a christian and in the bible, it says "thou shall not kill", and i strongly believe in that.people respond differently to satire—some like it, others don't get it. in at least 150 words, describe what you think of goines's narrative essay. discuss whether you think his position is convincing.the satire kept people's attention, rather than just rambling. instead of being dead serious, he adds humor to enlighten it. i think he did a good job of proving his point, but convincing people to stray from their own beliefs is hard, and satire can be offensive to that person. overall i think that goines's narrative essay was good because narrative essay create deeper understanding. i also like that the narrative essay is in first-person. the essay was filled with diction and word choice to let you know that the essay is going to be witty yet satirical. his point was to write  

explanation: