Which of the following is a “guns or butter” decision? a. a nation decides to produce fewer fighter jets and more bridges. b. a nation shifts money from building railroads to building highways. c. a company decides to build armored tanks instead of bombs. d. a company chooses to make more cheese and less butter.

A nation decides to produce fewer fighter jets and more bridges

Explanation:

The issue of government choice between "weapons or butter" is a metaphor for governments' decisions about what to do with scarce public resources in times of war. Should governments invest in armaments or invest in internal needs, such as in infrastructure works? This is a trade-off, which consists of making a choice that excludes the other, even if it is possible to counterbalance the investments. In the case of the question, the trade of is between war fighters or between bridges - infrastructure for the country.

i bought a new phone

explanation:

i will send you the money when i get back from lunch

the answer is : the nut cases won't quit battling and their recurrence of flights will going to continue as before despite the fact that the battles are less hazardous now because of their bills have all of a sudden been blunted.   in the falcon dove diversion, two creatures will drive towards one another to crush one another, among the two one will win and other will swerve. in this way, clearly, the battle will be dependably there between two creatures for the assets or mate.