subject
Social Studies, 24.10.2019 23:43 sofiisabella10

Quickk
in 1978, bernie marcus and arthur blank were fired from their jobs. they both decided to combine their resources and open a new kind of home improvement store, "the home depot," in 1979. over time, it has become one of the most successful businesses of its kind in the united states. marcus and blank now give away millions of dollars to charities and non-profit organizations in their community. which statement best describes marcus' and blank's role as entrepreneurs? a) they were fired form their jobs in 1978. b) they decided to start "home depot" in 1979. c) "home depot" is a successful business. d) marcus and blank give away millions of dollars.

ansver
Answers: 2

Another question on Social Studies

question
Social Studies, 21.06.2019 16:00
The president of the island nation of winstone refuses to raise taxes, but wants to expand many government services and increase the size of winstone's armed forces. he plans to pay for all of the desired expenditures by printing more money. if the president carries out his plan by rapidly increasing the supply of money, winstone will likely experience:
Answers: 2
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 14:40
Which term describes a possible explanation of, or answer to, a scientific question that is based on prior knowledge or research and that is testable?
Answers: 2
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 16:30
Arthur met rottweiler breeders lynda and george at a dog show in rhode island. the couple, who reside in new york state, later sold several rottweiler dogs to arthur who lived in rhode island. arthur later sued lynda and george, claiming that the dogs were sick and infirm. he filed a complaint in rhode island courts, claiming that even though the dogs were sold in new york, the breeders had attended the dog show and advertised in the rottweiler newsletter which was distributed at the event in rhode island. based on the facts, do you think rhode island courts have personal jurisdiction in this case?
Answers: 3
question
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 06:00
Ahusband who believed that his wife was having an affair with his brother hired an arsonist to burn down the brother's house. they planned for the husband to take his brother to a ballgame so that the arsonist would be able to set the house on fire without detection. after the husband and brother left for the ballgame, however, the arsonist decided to abandon the plan and immediately left town without doing anything further. when the husband returned from the ballgame with the brother, he saw the house still standing and blurted out what was supposed to have happened. the husband and the arsonist were arrested and charged with conspiracy to commit arson. at the arsonist's trial, his attorney argued that he was innocent of the conspiracy because he decided not to go ahead with the plan, and nothing criminal had in fact occurred.at common law, how should a jury find the arsonist? a not guilty of conspiracy, because going to a ballgame is not a criminal overt act.b not guilty of conspiracy, because the husband, not the arsonist, committed the overt act.c guilty, because the husband executed his part of the plan.d guilty, because the arsonist agreed to set the brother's house on fire.
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
Quickk
in 1978, bernie marcus and arthur blank were fired from their jobs. they both decided...
Questions
question
Medicine, 16.07.2019 21:20
Questions on the website: 13722362