Igo further, and affirm that bills of rights, in the sense and to the extent in which they are contended for, are not only unnecessary in the proposed constitution, but would even be dangerous.
—alexander hamilton, the federalist paper 84

what point is alexander hamilton making?

And the proposed constitution, if adopted, will be the bill of rights of the union." Hamilton's argument is ultimately that a bill of rights should not be added to the Constitution, because the entire Constitution is in itself a bill of rights.

Explanation:

can you explain it better

this doesn't support enough information to answer the question.