In response to its decision in daubert, the u. s. supreme court created rule 702 of the federal rules of evidence. a. trueb. false

True

Explanation:

In the Daubert case, The case is tainted because the defendant provided 'expert witness' to give testimony in the favor, but the testimonies that given contradict the common scientific knowledge that is held by scientific community. Even though this happen, the juries still rule in favor of the defendant simply because they  brought 'an expert'.

To prevent this from happening again, the supreme court created rule 702 which restrict the type of expert testimonies that are admissible in court.

your answer is "graduates" hope this