Suppose there is a policy debate regarding the united states’ imposing trade restrictions on imported tires. read the following scenario and answer the question that follows. a congresswoman from a state with several tire factories argues that the government should impose a tariff on tires because they are a necessary input into the production of various weapons. free trade, she contends, would make the united states overly dependent on foreign countries for the supply of tires and thus, in case of war, unable to make enough weapons to defend itself. which of the following justifications is the congresswoman using to argue for the trade restriction on tires? national-security argument unfair-competition argument infant-industry argument using-protection-as-a-bargaining-ch ip argument jobs argument

if you have to make a general question and respond to your thoughts, then this isn't really a question someone can you on. read the passage, form your question, and answer using your thoughts. no one else can understand how you interpreted this text if you don't tell us.

for many centuries there were important factors which the economies of the muslim empires developed increasingly. they applied economic procedures in production, investment, finance, taxation and property. they used to tax certain goods (for example: harvest), they charged interest on money lent, they signed contracts with merchants; they relied on a common currency, and they used checks as well as promissory notes. with the money collected by means of taxation, the government provided the needy with an income. in addition, trading networks covered huge distances, so far regions started to have contact and exchange goods. this trade network covered areas of asia, africa and europe.

yes peace and development are complementary to each other since they both undergo a great deal of getting where they want to go whether its peace in general and. development