Finally, consider the following cost-shifting rule, similar in spirit to federal rule 68. if the case goes to trial and no damages are awarded, each side pays its own expenses. if damages are awarded and are lower than a settlement offer the plaintiff (victim) refused, the plaintiff pays both sides’ expenses. if damages are higher than a settlement offer the defendant (insurer) refused, the defendant pays both sides’ expenses

what are the choices? the multiple choices?

i will answer in the comments after the choices have been said.

facts: the 14th amendment

the 14th amendment addresses citizenship rights and equal protection of the laws.

the 14th amendment was intended to protect the rights of former slaves after the american civil war.

the 14th amendment was approved by congress in june of 1866 and ratified by the states on july 9, 1868.

the 14th amendment establishes that all persons born in the united states are citizens and are guaranteed all the rights of citizenship.

the 14th amendment establishes that the law protects all citizens equally.

in this case the passage of the 14th amendment   that was violated was the last part in which it states that there is equal protection of the law.

protectionism fosters competition and keeps price regulated is not an argument in favor of protectionism.