subject

Aprofessor at big state university is writing a biography about bill gates and conducting oral histories with all of bill gates’ friends, family members, and business acquaintances. the researcher submits the research proposal to the institution’s irb. what action can he expect by the irb? the irb will not review this study because it is not research as defined by the federal regulations. the irb will not review this study because it does not include human subjects as defined by the federal regulations. the irb will review this study because it includes human subjects and is considered research. the irb will not review this study because it does not involve an investigational new device.

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on Social Studies

question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 10:30
Risk of harm in social and behavioral sciences generally fall in three categories, which are: breach of confidentiality, loss of autonomy, and study proceduresstudy procedures, breach of confidentiality, and loss of employmentinvasion of privacy, adverse reaction to study drug, and discriminationinvasion of privacy, breach of confidentiality, and study procedures
Answers: 3
question
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 03:30
Why was new orleans destined to be the center of slave trade in the southern united states
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 04:50
Which of the following is not a result of increased democracy in russia?
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 06:00
Ahusband who believed that his wife was having an affair with his brother hired an arsonist to burn down the brother's house. they planned for the husband to take his brother to a ballgame so that the arsonist would be able to set the house on fire without detection. after the husband and brother left for the ballgame, however, the arsonist decided to abandon the plan and immediately left town without doing anything further. when the husband returned from the ballgame with the brother, he saw the house still standing and blurted out what was supposed to have happened. the husband and the arsonist were arrested and charged with conspiracy to commit arson. at the arsonist's trial, his attorney argued that he was innocent of the conspiracy because he decided not to go ahead with the plan, and nothing criminal had in fact occurred.at common law, how should a jury find the arsonist? a not guilty of conspiracy, because going to a ballgame is not a criminal overt act.b not guilty of conspiracy, because the husband, not the arsonist, committed the overt act.c guilty, because the husband executed his part of the plan.d guilty, because the arsonist agreed to set the brother's house on fire.
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
Aprofessor at big state university is writing a biography about bill gates and conducting oral histo...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 01.08.2019 10:30
Questions on the website: 13722362