Aresearcher conducting behavioral research collects individually identifiable sensitive information about illicit drug use and other illegal behaviors by surveying college students. one of the subjects is in an automobile accident two weeks after participating in the research study. is this an example of an unanticipated problem that requires reporting to the irb? yes, this must be reported because it involved a subject in a research study and it is up to the irb to determine if it was related to participation. yes, this must be reported because it was not listed as a risk of study participation in the consent form (was unexpected) and the subject experienced harm. no, this does not need to be reported to the irb since the researcher reported it to the sponsor of the study. no, this does not need to be reported because it was assessed by the researcher as unrelated to the research study.

Athief was passing by a house under construction when he noticed that the ladder being used by workers on the roof had copper braces supporting the rungs. after making sure that the workers on the roof could not see him, the thief used pliers that he had in his pocket to remove all of the copper braces that he could reach from the ground. a short time later, a worker climbed down the ladder and it collapsed. he fell to the ground and severely injured his back. the thief was apprehended a few hours later trying to sell the copper for scrap. a statute in the jurisdiction makes it a felony for "maliciously causing serious physical injury to another." the thief was charged with malicious injury under the statute and was also charged with larceny. after a jury trial in which the above facts were presented, he was convicted of both charges. if he appeals the conviction for the malicious injury charge on grounds of insufficient evidence, how should the court rule? a affirm the conviction, because the thief was engaged in criminal conduct at the time of the act that resulted in the injury. b affirm the conviction, because the jury could have found that the thief acted with malice. c reverse the conviction, because there was no evidence that the thief intended to injure anyone. d reverse the conviction, because there was no evidence that the thief bore any malice towards the workers on the roof.

What role does the government have in resolving domestic disputes and disagreements

Ineed your asap, it due a crisis erupted in the 1830s over nullification. nullification is stating that something is null and void (not valid) and is not accepted. to nullify is to refuse to recognize. with the definition of nullification above, identify the cause of the political crisis in the 1830’s and the risk it created for the nation. question 3 options: the crisis was over the power of the presidency- the congress believed that the president should not be allowed to keep the power of the veto. the risk to the country was the presidency turning into a dictatorship. the crisis was a power struggle between the states rights and power of the federal government. the risk to the country was the possibility of states seceding from the union. the crisis was over whether taxing was constitutional. the risk to the country was that the people were being taxed unfairly the crisis involved states deciding to support other countries in their civil wars. the risk to the country was that states may begin fighting with each other over their alliances.