subject
Social Studies, 23.07.2019 04:20 haimar8710

Several members of a small terrorist group are on trial in federal court for conspiring to bomb a military installation. the prosecution would like to introduce the testimony of a military guard at one of the installation's gates. the guard had been present when a bomb that was being planted by a member of the group had exploded prematurely. the guard will testify that she ran over to administer first aid to the member, who in great pain told her that his group was in the process of planting three other bombs in other areas of the military installation and was going to detonate them all at the same time to get publicity for their cause. the guard will also testify that the member disclosed the locations of the other bombs and the names of two other members of the group. the authorities were able to prevent the other bombings and arrest the other members of the group. the member died from his injuries. what is the best basis for allowing the guard to testify as to the member's statements? a as a vicarious admission of a co-conspirator. b as a statement against interest. c as a statement of present state of mind. d as a dying declaration.

ansver
Answers: 3

Another question on Social Studies

question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 21:30
Which quotation reflects the perspective of most of georgia legislatures in 1956 regarding the georgia state flag?
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 06:40
When a explodes, radioactive material is dispersed. understanding terrorism: select the best answer from the choices provided. a. germ bomb b. dirty bomb c. chemical explosive d. commercial airplane
Answers: 2
question
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 08:00
Highlight ideas in this passage that show why the anti-federalists objected to the constitution. if it were possible to consolidate the states, and preserve the features of a free government . . [w]ealth, offices, and the benefits of government would collect in the center: and the extreme states . . become much less important. . i still believe a complete federal bill of rights to be very practicable. which reasons below explain why the anti-federalists objected to the constitution? check all that apply power would be too centralized. a bill of rights was included. states would become less powerful. a bill of rights was not included. states would become more powerful.
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 08:30
Analyze the photo below and answer the question that follows. photo by perry quan what kind of service does the facility in the photo above provide, according to christaller's central place theory? a. low-order service b. high-order service c. low-growth service d. specialized-need service
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
Several members of a small terrorist group are on trial in federal court for conspiring to bomb a mi...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 06.05.2020 02:35
Questions on the website: 13722363