subject
Social Studies, 23.07.2019 05:40 0gNanaa

Aseller entered into a written contract to sell a tract of land to a buyer. the buyer was to pay $1,500 per month for five years, at which time the seller would deliver a warranty deed. the contract was silent as to the quality of title to be conveyed. after making 12 payments, the buyer discovered that a neighbor had an easement of way over the land, which was not discussed at the time the seller and buyer entered into the contract. the neighbor had not used the easement over the previous year because she had been out of the country. on the basis of the easement, the buyer wishes to cancel the contract. which party is more likely to prevail? a the seller, because the neighbor's easement has been extinguished. b the seller, because the buyer has no basis on which to rescind the contract. c the buyer, because the obligation to convey marketable title is implied. d the buyer, because the seller has breached the covenant against encumbrances.

ansver
Answers: 2

Another question on Social Studies

question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 04:00
Erikson's theory of personality grants more power to the than freud had allowed.
Answers: 2
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 20:40
Using the president's schedule, identify one example of the president using constitutional powers and fulfilling his duties. then, explain how and why that power is limited. give your answer in the form of at least three complete sentences.
Answers: 2
question
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 01:50
Research and review one of the following cases: 1. eeoc vs abercrombie and fitch inc. 2. young vs ups 3. vance vs ball state university after you have thought through and understand the case answer the following: 1. explain the facts of the case leading to the dispute. 2. define and show understanding of each of the terms assigned to your case. break the laws into components where necessary. eeoc vs abercrombie and fitch inc: 1) eeoc, 2) title vii, 3) disparate treatment discrimination, 4)disparate impact discrimination vance vs ball state university: 1) eeoc, 2) title vii, 3) hostile work environment, 4) a supervisor for title vii purposes young vs ups: 1) title vii, 2) pregnancy discrimination act, 3)american's with disabilities act, 4) reasonable accommodation 3.how do the above concepts come into play in the case? 4. what rule of law came from the case? what did the court decide? 5. based on your understanding of employment law was the ruling correct? explain using a legal principle.
Answers: 2
question
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 03:50
The most effective way for individuals to influence the outcome of the protectiveequipment proposal is toa.b.c.d.circulate a petitionjoin a political partymake a presentation to the school boardwrite a letter to their provincial government representative
Answers: 3
You know the right answer?
Aseller entered into a written contract to sell a tract of land to a buyer. the buyer was to pay $1,...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 12.02.2021 14:00
question
Mathematics, 12.02.2021 14:00
question
History, 12.02.2021 14:00
question
Mathematics, 12.02.2021 14:00
question
Biology, 12.02.2021 14:00
question
History, 12.02.2021 14:00
Questions on the website: 13722363