In a criminal trial, the prosecutor called a witness to the stand to authenticate the voice in a tape recording as the defendant's. the only other time the witness had heard the defendant's voice was after his arrest. assuming a proper foundation has been laid, may the witness properly authenticate the defendant's voice? a yes, because the witness is now familiar with the defendant's voice. b yes, because the prosecutor can qualify the witness as an expert on the defendant's voice. c no, because the witness's testimony would be inadmissible hearsay. d no, because the witness did not hear the defendant's voice until after he was arrested.

The defendant and an accomplice were on trial together for burglary. both had given confessions implicating themselves and their accomplice. at trial, the defendant maintained that his confession had been obtained through improper coercion by the police. for the purpose of countering the claim of coercion, the prosecution seeks to place the accomplice’s confession into evidence. after objection by the defendant’s counsel, the judge agrees to issue a limiting instruction to the jury that the confession is to be considered only with regard to the question of whether the defendant’s confession was coerced. may the accomplice’s confession be admitted under that condition?

Which statement defines personality

Lyle is concerned about the difference between a company's salaries for its white workers and its colombian workers. in order to place economic pressure on the company, what does lyle need to do?