subject
Social Studies, 23.07.2019 16:10 genyjoannerubiera

)question refers to the excerpt below. “to judge from the conduct of the opposite parties, we shall be led to conclude that they will mutually hope to evince the justness of their opinions, and to increase the number of their converts by the loudness of their declamations and the bitterness of their invectives. an enlightened zeal for the energy and efficiency of government will be stigmatized as the offspring of a temper fond of despotic power and hostile to the principles of liberty. an over-scrupulous jealousy of danger to the rights of the people, which is more commonly the fault of the head than of the heart, will be represented as mere pretense and artifice, the stale bait for popularity at the expense of the public good.” —alexander hamilton, 1787 which of the following accurately reflects the excerpt? hamilton is an anti-federalist arguing that the articles of confederation merely need some amendments. hamilton is a federalist arguing that the constitution is necessary to quiet the radical elements in society. hamilton is an anti-federalist arguing that the constitution endangers the individual liberties of citizens. hamilton is a federalist arguing that those against the constitution risk the survival of the new nation.

ansver
Answers: 3

Another question on Social Studies

question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 06:20
How did the kansas-nebraska act contradict the missouri compromise?
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 22:00
Population parameters are difficult to calculate due to
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 07:30
When should you question a sources credibility
Answers: 2
question
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 14:30
Horton automatics and the industrial division of the communications workers of america, the union that represented horton’s workers, negotiated a collective bargaining agreement. if an employee’s discharge for a workplace-rule violation was submitted to arbitration, the agreement limited the arbitrator to determining whether the rule was reasonable and whether the employee had violated it. when horton discharged employee ruben de la garza, the union appealed to arbitration. the arbitrator found that de la garza had violated a reasonable safety rule, but “was not totally convinced” that horton should have treated the violation more seriously than other rule violations. the arbitrator ordered de la garza reinstated. can a court set aside this order
Answers: 3
You know the right answer?
)question refers to the excerpt below. “to judge from the conduct of the opposite parties, we shall...
Questions
question
Biology, 05.01.2020 22:31
Questions on the website: 13722363