An elderly woman filed a complaint in federal district court, alleging that a salesperson “made fraudulent statements that induced the plaintiff to sign the contract to the plaintiff’s detriment.” the salesperson then filed a motion to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. how should the court rule?

The reason why I would say that the court rule for the sales person by grating the motion because the elderly lady wasn't very specific in her claim.

The elderly women would need to have more proof or evidence on how the salesperson made fraudulent statements that made her sign the contract.

The plaintiff, or elderly women's "claim for relief" would not specify the outcome that the elderly women wants to see in court. This would make her statement "insufficient."

If the elderly women told the court what outcome she wanted in the court and what she would do with the outcome would've possibly have the court lean towards her, but since she didn't have that, they would possibly grant the motion that was filed by the salesperson.

buildings sir and respect

hello,

question- which is one way that muslims scholars contributed to the scientific recolution?

answer- well you see in the religion islam the religion muslims practice there was the prophet muahmmed peace be upon him who did good things such as sit in a sertian posotion to use the toilet which then the scientist of this generation later found that it was good for you there are many more things like this.

important- if my answer was enough for you to understand mark me as brainliest you and have the best day ever!