Social Studies, 26.08.2019 18:00 peno211

Which of the following statements are true about attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder?
a. the use of stimulants in small doses focus attention and reduces hyperactivity.
b. for children with adhd, excessive fidgeting them focus on the task at hand.
c. drugs prescribed for adhd have the same effect on people who do not have adhd as it does on people with adhd.
d. stimulant drugs taken for adhd reduce symptoms by increasing the release of dopamine and serotonin.

Answers: 2

Show answers

Answers

Answer from: miacespedes

A. The use of stimulants in small doses helps focus attention and reduces hyperactivity.

Explanation:

Methylphenidate is a common drug stimulant that is given to the children above five-year-old for ADHD. This medicine comes under a category called stimulant which increases the activity of the brain particularly that area which suppresses the level activity related to attention and concentration. but it has some side effects of stimulants.

Heart rate and blood pressure get increase.Appetite loss leads to underweightLoss of sleepLoss libidoMood swings etc.

Answer from: Quest

soothing tone) but quickly, the tone changes from a light tone to a grim one. by introducing disturbing word choices that are illogical.make a list of some of levertov’s images of war from both of her poems. how do her wordsaffect you? do you agree with her position on war? write a short response (at least 100 words) and support your answer with personal experience or your studiespoets can change the tone in a poem, and levertov does when the she refers to "delicate man . .whose eyes/are flowers that perceive the stars”. the word choices here are different. theimages began to show feelings of hope/potential. but this mood is interrupted with the dark oppressive words "entrails of still-alive babies" and "carcass-gulleys". levertov continues to switch tones by "the deep intelligence living at peace would have"—one is left with a sense of hope. i can connect with her words that humans can do better things than fight in war. we only have one life so dying in a war would be for no reason. also, i am a christian and in the bible, it says "thou shall not kill", and i strongly believe in that.people respond differently to satire—some like it, others don't get it. in at least 150 words, describe what you think of goines's narrative essay. discuss whether you think his position is convincing.the satire kept people's attention, rather than just rambling. instead of being dead serious, he adds humor to enlighten it. i think he did a good job of proving his point, but convincing people to stray from their own beliefs is hard, and satire can be offensive to that person. overall i think that goines's narrative essay was good because narrative essay create deeper understanding. i also like that the narrative essay is in first-person. the essay was filled with diction and word choice to let you know that the essay is going to be witty yet satirical. his point was to write

explanation:

Answer from: Quest

if you have ask any question and if you have got the answer reply for your position there will be option for making a brain least answer you need to click click there and they can get the points in brain list main thing is that you need to choose those answer which answer you are you think that it is to you

Another question on Social Studies

Social Studies, 21.06.2019 17:00

According to the principles of the enlightenment, which of the following government actions would be inappropriate? (select all that apply.)

Answers: 3

Answer

Social Studies, 22.06.2019 01:30

An artist entered into a written agreement to sell a patron a partially finished painting once it was complete. the patron later learned that the artist planned to sell the painting to a third party who offered to pay the artist more than the contract price. the patron filed suit to compel the artist to sell the painting to her in accord with the terms of their agreement, while the artist denied that the painting the artist planned to sell to the third party was the subject of the agreement with the patron. at trial, the patron did not introduce the written agreement or explain its absence. rather, the patron sought to testify that, when she signed the agreement, the artist had pointed to the painting in question and stated that it was the patronâ€™s painting. the artistâ€™s attorney objected to the testimony that the artist identified the painting as belonging to the patron. how should the court rule? asustain the objection, because the artistâ€™s statement was hearsay. bsustain the objection, because the patron failed to produce the written agreement or explain its absence. coverrule the objection, because the statement is not hearsay. doverrule the objection, because the statement was relevant.

Answers: 3

Answer

Social Studies, 22.06.2019 03:00

How did the aztec culture benefit spain when they were conquering the aztecs?

Answers: 1

Answer

Social Studies, 22.06.2019 03:20

Small plane just crashed in your neighborhood. you take a fire extinguisher and blankets to the scene, then stand back and silently gather with others on the scene when you realize there is nothing you can do to . in this situation, gathering quietly with others out of reverence and respect is an example of coping.

Answers: 1

Answer

You know the right answer?

Which of the following statements are true about attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder?
a...

Questions