subject
Social Studies, 26.08.2019 19:00 yannabby26

Ageneral requirement for informed consent is that no informed consent may include any exculpatory language. exculpatory language is that which waives or appears to waive any of the subject's legal rights or releases or appears to release those conducting the research from liability for negligence. what statement in a consent form is an example of exculpatory language?

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on Social Studies

question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 21:00
Recently, there has been pressure to loosen clean air standards. use economic arguments to support or oppose this proposed action.
Answers: 3
question
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 00:40
Which act was a response to three high-profile assassinations? a. the mailing of firearms act b. the national firearms act c. the gun control act d. the brady handgun violence prevention act
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 04:31
All of the following apply to a company’s stockholders except: a. they make all company decisions. b. they are also called shareholders. c. they may sell their stock to others. d. they are entitled to share in company profits .
Answers: 2
question
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 05:30
Athief was passing by a house under construction when he noticed that the ladder being used by workers on the roof had copper braces supporting the rungs. after making sure that the workers on the roof could not see him, the thief used pliers that he had in his pocket to remove all of the copper braces that he could reach from the ground. a short time later, a worker climbed down the ladder and it collapsed. he fell to the ground and severely injured his back. the thief was apprehended a few hours later trying to sell the copper for scrap. a statute in the jurisdiction makes it a felony for "maliciously causing serious physical injury to another." the thief was charged with malicious injury under the statute and was also charged with larceny. after a jury trial in which the above facts were presented, he was convicted of both charges. if he appeals the conviction for the malicious injury charge on grounds of insufficient evidence, how should the court rule? a affirm the conviction, because the thief was engaged in criminal conduct at the time of the act that resulted in the injury. b affirm the conviction, because the jury could have found that the thief acted with malice. c reverse the conviction, because there was no evidence that the thief intended to injure anyone. d reverse the conviction, because there was no evidence that the thief bore any malice towards the workers on the roof.
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
Ageneral requirement for informed consent is that no informed consent may include any exculpatory la...
Questions
Questions on the website: 13722363