Arandom sample of registered voters from tampa, fl were asked if they support the dream act, a proposed law which would provide a path to citizenship for people brought illegally to the us as children. the survey also collected information on the political ideology of the respondents. based on the mosaic plot shown below, do views on the dream act and political ideology appear to be independent?

Views on the Dream act and political ideology do not seem to be independent.

Explanation:

The mosaic plot displays that Liberals are more  likely to encourage the act compared to Moderates and Conservatives. It is evident by the fact that the bar representing Liberals supporting the ideology covers more area compared to the other two parties and this is something that makes the viewpoints on the dream act and political ideology far from independent.

limited access to education

the answer is the petition of right.

explanation:

offer to of right, real demand of attesting a benefit against the english crown, the most remarkable point of reference being the petition of right of 1628, which parliament sent to charles i fussing of a movement of oversteps of law. the term also implied the framework (invalidated in 1947) by which a subject could sue the crown.   taking a gander at the frameworks used by maria amidu to make a standard in 2015 commending the 1628 petition of right, which was sent to charles i by the english parliament. at uniquely based law the crown, or the sovereign in his official cutoff, couldn't be sued in the ruler's courts. since the ruler was, really, the superior ace of those courts, coordinating value in them between his subjects, he was not subject to their ward. therefore it transformed into a preparation, at whatever point a subject's certified or individual property had come into the responsibility for ruler or his specialists without legitimate perfect, for the subject to engage the master in chamber for its recovery.