subject
Social Studies, 12.09.2019 22:30 jackie0833

Enzo takes vendela to see a horror movie on their first date. he knows that people who feel strong emotions rely on situational cues to label the emotion. he hopes that the film will increase the activity in vendela's nervous system and that she will interpret the arousal as attraction to him. enzo is relying on thea) two-factor theory of emotion. b) upward comparison. c) facial feedback hypothesis. d) cannon-bard theory.

ansver
Answers: 3

Another question on Social Studies

question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 12:10
Which of the following is true of cultural syndromes of distress? a. it refers to attributing pathological symptoms to normative cultural differences. b. refers to misinterpreting culturally sanctioned behavior as expressions of pathological symptoms. c. it refers to the ways that communities and cultural groups communicate and express their distressing thoughts, behaviors, and emotions. d. it refers to patterns of symptoms that tend to cluster together for individuals in specific cultural groups, communities, or contexts.
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 17:40
Why did the whiskey rebellion protest?
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 05:30
Athief was passing by a house under construction when he noticed that the ladder being used by workers on the roof had copper braces supporting the rungs. after making sure that the workers on the roof could not see him, the thief used pliers that he had in his pocket to remove all of the copper braces that he could reach from the ground. a short time later, a worker climbed down the ladder and it collapsed. he fell to the ground and severely injured his back. the thief was apprehended a few hours later trying to sell the copper for scrap. a statute in the jurisdiction makes it a felony for "maliciously causing serious physical injury to another." the thief was charged with malicious injury under the statute and was also charged with larceny. after a jury trial in which the above facts were presented, he was convicted of both charges. if he appeals the conviction for the malicious injury charge on grounds of insufficient evidence, how should the court rule? a affirm the conviction, because the thief was engaged in criminal conduct at the time of the act that resulted in the injury. b affirm the conviction, because the jury could have found that the thief acted with malice. c reverse the conviction, because there was no evidence that the thief intended to injure anyone. d reverse the conviction, because there was no evidence that the thief bore any malice towards the workers on the roof.
Answers: 2
question
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 14:00
Account for differences in percentage population growth rates between more economically developed countries and less economically developed countries
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
Enzo takes vendela to see a horror movie on their first date. he knows that people who feel strong e...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 17.07.2020 02:01
question
Mathematics, 17.07.2020 02:01
question
Mathematics, 17.07.2020 02:01
Questions on the website: 13722360