subject
Social Studies, 19.09.2019 21:30 jlayne0605

Cindy, lana, and david all work for different companies. cindy has noticed that her manufacturing overhead has a debit balance, while lana has noticed the opposite, as her balance has a credit. david is focused on his work in process inventory account, which has a debit balance. what is implied here?

ansver
Answers: 2

Another question on Social Studies

question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 03:00
Which of the following might cause the inflation rate to spike up sharply? the purchasing power of the average consumer decreases due to a sluggish economy. plentiful rainfall and moderate temperatures result in good harvests of wheat and soybeans. the items in the cpi market basket change to account for changing consumer buying habits. prices on world oil markets rise steeply due to war in the middle east.
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 09:40
What would be the most relevant question to ask to find out why tutankhamen died? what was tutankhamen’s age when he died? was a doctor with tutankhamen at his death? why was tutankhamen mummified after his death? did tutankhamen’s body have evidence of disease?
Answers: 2
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 10:00
Which conflict is often referred to as the first "televised war"? a) gulf war b) korean war c) vietnam war d) world war ii
Answers: 2
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 13:00
Awoman was found strangled in the basement of her home where she lived with her husband. the crime scene was processed and investigators left. the next day, the medical examiner reported that a scalloped, woven belt was used to strangle the victim. the police asked the husband to search the house again to look for such a belt and he agreed. a belt was found that matched marks on the victim. the man was arrested. his attorney made a motion that the belt be excluded from the evidence as he contended that the search was not legal. which statement is true? a. the belt should be excluded because the search was not legal. the police did not obtain a search warrant, as needed according to the fourth amendment to the u.s. constitution. b. the belt is admissible because the man gave his consent to the second search. c. the belt should be excluded because the search was not legal. the police did not obtain a search warrant, as need according to michigan v. tyler. d. the belt is admissible as evidence, according to mincey v. arizona.
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
Cindy, lana, and david all work for different companies. cindy has noticed that her manufacturing ov...
Questions
question
Spanish, 13.10.2019 14:00
question
Mathematics, 13.10.2019 14:00
question
History, 13.10.2019 14:00
Questions on the website: 13722367