subject
Social Studies, 20.09.2019 19:10 kittybatch345

Discuss the following question: 1. how is the "process of globalization" different today than in 2000? name three historical milestones since 9/11 that have changed the course of globalization. explain each of these milestones in terms of "why" they impact globalization. remember to read your texts, watch any videos in the lesson overview, and read any other materials in your weekly lesson. include those ideas in your discussions. also, feel free to include a link to a website or a journal article to share with your classmates to support your views.

ansver
Answers: 3

Another question on Social Studies

question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 09:30
Essay: both benedict arnold and alexander hamilton were ambitious men who took great risks as leaders in the american revolution. write an essay in which you discuss the impact that the ambitions of individuals had on the birth of the united states. remember to use textual evidence from both written sources to support your argument.
Answers: 2
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 18:40
What is β€œthe compromise of 1850? ” *
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 20:30
Globalization and technology developments have led to what some individuals have described as "flat world." what is the significance of the flat world concept? what is the impact of the flat world on supply chain requirements and strategies?
Answers: 2
question
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 05:30
Athief was passing by a house under construction when he noticed that the ladder being used by workers on the roof had copper braces supporting the rungs. after making sure that the workers on the roof could not see him, the thief used pliers that he had in his pocket to remove all of the copper braces that he could reach from the ground. a short time later, a worker climbed down the ladder and it collapsed. he fell to the ground and severely injured his back. the thief was apprehended a few hours later trying to sell the copper for scrap. a statute in the jurisdiction makes it a felony for "maliciously causing serious physical injury to another." the thief was charged with malicious injury under the statute and was also charged with larceny. after a jury trial in which the above facts were presented, he was convicted of both charges. if he appeals the conviction for the malicious injury charge on grounds of insufficient evidence, how should the court rule? a affirm the conviction, because the thief was engaged in criminal conduct at the time of the act that resulted in the injury. b affirm the conviction, because the jury could have found that the thief acted with malice. c reverse the conviction, because there was no evidence that the thief intended to injure anyone. d reverse the conviction, because there was no evidence that the thief bore any malice towards the workers on the roof.
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
Discuss the following question: 1. how is the "process of globalization" different today than in 20...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 12.08.2020 09:01
question
Physics, 12.08.2020 09:01
question
Mathematics, 12.08.2020 09:01
question
Chemistry, 12.08.2020 09:01
question
English, 12.08.2020 09:01
Questions on the website: 13722360