The economist steven landsburg claims that with a death penalty, each execution deters about eight murders, resulting in a benefit to society of approximately $56 million. he argues that computer hackers do far more damage to society with their worms and viruses. he argues that computer hackers should be executed as well. from a purely economic perspective, the death penalty for computer hackers is:

reasonable

Explanation:

Based on the information provided within the question it can be said that from a purely economic perspective, the death penalty for computer hackers is reasonable. This is because if all the information provided is true, that means that computer hackers are causing millions of dollars in damage from their hacks, and if a murder execution benefits society with approximately $56 million then we can assume that, an execution for a computer hacker will also deter other hackers and save a significantly higher amount of money for society. This is all based on a purely economic stand point but the death penalty should not be decided on economics alone but also take into consideration social, political, and religious factors.

I hope this answered your question. If you have any more questions feel free to ask away at .

the correct answer is individualism and exchange. at this stage, children begin to question the rules, because they can see that there is more than one side to them. different individuals have different viewpoints. they won't be able to reach this stage because of ignorance, a lack of ethics or personal biases. that is because people with that characteristiscs are not able to distinguish what is good or what is bad and they can't pursue their individual interests.

freeborn women in ancient rome were citizens (cives), but could not vote or hold political office. because of their limited public role, women are named less frequently than men by roman historians. but while roman women held no direct political power, those from wealthy or powerful families could and did exert influence through private negotiations. exceptional women who left an undeniable mark on history range from lucretia and claudia quinta, whose stories took on mythic significance; fierce republican-era women such as cornelia, mother of the gracchi, and fulvia, who commanded an army and issued coins bearing her image; women of the julio-claudian dynasty, most prominently livia (58 bc-ad 29), who contributed to the formation of imperial mores; and the empress helena (c.250–330 ad), a driving force in promoting christianity.

women in the ancient greek world had few rights in comparison to male citizens. unable to vote, own land, or inherit, a woman’s place was in the home and her purpose in life was the rearing of children. this, though, is a general description, and when considering the role of women in ancient greece one should remember that information regarding specific city-states is often lacking, is almost always from male authors, and only in athens can their status and role be described in any great detail. neither are we sure of the practical and everyday application of the rules and laws that have survived from antiquity. we do know that spartan women were treated somewhat differently than in other states. for example, they had to do physical training like men, were permitted to own land, and could drink wine.