In an ideal society, how should the values of autonomy, equality and general well-being be prioritized?

Explanation:

Prioritize and priority view within ethics and philosophy that hold that the goodness and outcomes are the functions of overall well being across all individuals. Prioritize is resembles the utilitarianism. Prioritize is the aggregate form of consequential ism hence it does not weight all the individually equally but prioritize those individuals that are most worse off. This term holds the moral value of achieving benefits for achieving the benefit of individuals. The greater size of well being are, measured by the rating scale of well being. It doesn't serve as a tie-breaker but even it will go against all utility. Thus under normal circumstances a utilitarian giving the resources. There are many objections in adherence to the aggregation consequences.

what is the other part to the question

the arab empire adopted the muslim religion as their main belief. arabs would influence the people from the territories they invaded towards islam (the muslim belief).

nevertheless, throughout the history of the arab empire, rulers brought intellectual individuals from other religions to their centers of learning. these other foreigners included jews, christians, greeks, persians, and indians.   these resulted in the adoption of important knowledge developed by these cultures by the arabic empire. for example, the works of aristotle were translated from greek to arab and indian scientists brought the numerical concept of "zero" to the arabs.

nowadays, 93% of the arab population is muslim, which at the same time is subdivided in sects including the sunni, zaini, alawi, shia. the remaining 7% is composed mainly of christians.