Social Studies, 26.09.2019 16:10 omar5457
An investigator wants to see whether packaging information affects the way people rate breakfast cereal. the same cereal is put in three packages: (a) a brown box that says, "to start your day off with a smile"; (b) a yellow box that says, "for extra energy all day"; and (c) a white box that says, "fortified with b complex and iron." in this study the
Answers: 3
Social Studies, 21.06.2019 21:00
Troy is the ceo of a manufacturing company, and he is planning to open a new factory in his community.because the new factory will require heavier traffic from delivery trucks and employees' cars, troy is partnering with the city to expand and rebuild roadways in the neighborhood.as part of opening the factory, he also plans to create a new hiring program. because he wants his workers to gain skills, he will also offer them the opportunity to attend college courses to receive business training. which of these outcomes are possible negative externalities? check all that apply. increased traffic in the neighborhood surrounding the factory better roads for drivers in the area more educated workers in the community pollution from trucks making deliveries to the factory new job opportunities in the city
Answers: 1
Social Studies, 21.06.2019 21:10
What is the main goal of the world trade organization a. to fight enforce tariffs b. to fight against terrorism c. to encourage trade d. to regulate international investments
Answers: 1
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 01:20
Using mr smith and his id, identify two potential internal validity threats that might affect the aβb design. tell me how that threat might impact conclusions in the aβb design. note #1: you cannot use maturation (since i already did that one for note #2: there are some mr smith id threats that wonβt have much impact in a single case design.
Answers: 1
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 01:50
Research and review one of the following cases: 1. eeoc vs abercrombie and fitch inc. 2. young vs ups 3. vance vs ball state university after you have thought through and understand the case answer the following: 1. explain the facts of the case leading to the dispute. 2. define and show understanding of each of the terms assigned to your case. break the laws into components where necessary. eeoc vs abercrombie and fitch inc: 1) eeoc, 2) title vii, 3) disparate treatment discrimination, 4)disparate impact discrimination vance vs ball state university: 1) eeoc, 2) title vii, 3) hostile work environment, 4) a supervisor for title vii purposes young vs ups: 1) title vii, 2) pregnancy discrimination act, 3)american's with disabilities act, 4) reasonable accommodation 3.how do the above concepts come into play in the case? 4. what rule of law came from the case? what did the court decide? 5. based on your understanding of employment law was the ruling correct? explain using a legal principle.
Answers: 2
An investigator wants to see whether packaging information affects the way people rate breakfast cer...
Biology, 23.08.2019 22:30
Mathematics, 23.08.2019 22:30
Social Studies, 23.08.2019 22:30
Mathematics, 23.08.2019 22:30
Mathematics, 23.08.2019 22:30
Mathematics, 23.08.2019 22:30
Mathematics, 23.08.2019 22:30