Ravi, a supervisor at autumn inc., notices that the company has been successful in outperforming its competitors in the industry and declares that the company has achieved competitive advantage. yolanda, a manager at autumn inc., argues that this is not true. which of the following strengthens ravi's claim?

Autumn Inc. has been consistently outperforming its rivals in generating above- average profits

Explanation:

Ravi the supervisor at Autumn Inc notices that the company is outperforming it's competitors in industry and declares it though Yolanda contradicts the statements of Ravi.

The statement that strengthens Ravi's claim is that Autumn Inc. has been consistently outperforming its rivals in generating above- average profits.

if interdependence implies a two-way dependence, and if each partner is equally dependent on the other for success, then there is an equal commitment to the making the partnership successful. the advantage is sustainability of the relationship, the disadvantage is that decisions are "democratic" and therefore may take longer to reach and more likely to be a compromise (which is not always the best solution). as the interdependence moves away from equality, the decisions become more influenced by the more independent partner. in the extreme the relationship becomes more dictatorial and more like "master-slave". generally the relationship has less commitment in both directions and is more likely to be temporary.

if one generalizes (and one shouldn't), equity partnerships, which is probably what is implied by interdependence, can be slow to progress or change but durable. the extreme alternative, independent-dependent partnerships tend to be efficient but more fragile.

hope this but you will have to site your own evidence. : )

to plan an idea out before