In north america "no till farming" has become a widespread practice made possible by genetically modified (gm) crops that can be sprayed with herbicide that kills everything but the gm plant. evaluate the following statements on the role of gm crops on soil conservation issues? they have no effect one way or the other on soil erosion. the herbicides kill beneficial plants and animals and eventually will make the soil sterile. the no till practice dramatically improves soil conservation by providing loose organic matter cover to the soil surface, breaking up wind and runoff, lowering erosion rates. they are a disaster. by killing all plants except the gm organism they expose the soil to increased erosion.

The no till practice dramatically improves soil conservation by providing loose organic matter cover to the soil surface, breaking up wind and runoff, lowering erosion rates.

Explanation:

What is a no-till farming ?

No-till farming which is also known as zero tillage is a farming in which crops are grown without touching the soil by using tillage.

The soil gains ability to absorb more water through this method and allows more nutrients absorption.

It improves the stability of the soil as it provides it with an increased fertility which extends the period in which the soil can be used for crops and increasing productivity of those crops.

soothing tone) but quickly, the tone changes from a light tone to a grim one. by introducing disturbing word choices that are illogical.make a list of some of levertov’s images of war from both of her poems. how do her wordsaffect you? do you agree with her position on war? write a short response (at least 100 words) and support your answer with personal experience or your studiespoets can change the tone in a poem, and levertov does when the she refers to "delicate man . .whose eyes/are flowers that perceive the stars”. the word choices here are different. theimages began to show feelings of hope/potential. but this mood is interrupted with the dark oppressive words "entrails of still-alive babies" and "carcass-gulleys". levertov continues to switch tones by "the deep intelligence living at peace would have"—one is left with a sense of hope. i can connect with her words that humans can do better things than fight in war. we only have one life so dying in a war would be for no reason. also, i am a christian and in the bible, it says "thou shall not kill", and i strongly believe in that.people respond differently to satire—some like it, others don't get it. in at least 150 words, describe what you think of goines's narrative essay. discuss whether you think his position is convincing.the satire kept people's attention, rather than just rambling. instead of being dead serious, he adds humor to enlighten it. i think he did a good job of proving his point, but convincing people to stray from their own beliefs is hard, and satire can be offensive to that person. overall i think that goines's narrative essay was good because narrative essay create deeper understanding. i also like that the narrative essay is in first-person. the essay was filled with diction and word choice to let you know that the essay is going to be witty yet satirical. his point was to write  

explanation:

no questions on whether they are allowed that right