Matching
- 1. mitanni kingdom
2. standing army
3. citizen-soldier
4. tribute
5. mercenary
a a foreign soldier hired by another country to fight in
its army
b. a soldier who returns home and resumes his life
when the fighting is over
c. composed of soldiers who choose the army as a
career; when they are not fighting, they are training
d. introduced trained horses and chariots to the
mesopotamian region
e. payment that conquered people were required to
pay to the conquerors
multinle choice

Research and review one of the following cases: 1. eeoc vs abercrombie and fitch inc. 2. young vs ups 3. vance vs ball state university after you have thought through and understand the case answer the following: 1. explain the facts of the case leading to the dispute. 2. define and show understanding of each of the terms assigned to your case. break the laws into components where necessary. eeoc vs abercrombie and fitch inc: 1) eeoc, 2) title vii, 3) disparate treatment discrimination, 4)disparate impact discrimination vance vs ball state university: 1) eeoc, 2) title vii, 3) hostile work environment, 4) a supervisor for title vii purposes young vs ups: 1) title vii, 2) pregnancy discrimination act, 3)american's with disabilities act, 4) reasonable accommodation 3.how do the above concepts come into play in the case? 4. what rule of law came from the case? what did the court decide? 5. based on your understanding of employment law was the ruling correct? explain using a legal principle.